TOPIC: PMMA AND WIDTH

I wonder if it is possible to use PMMA on penis but not with the purpose of just gaining overall volume, but specifically width. Can technicians use PMMA for changing the aesthetic visuals of a penis? For example, one standard full round with more of the filler on the sides and less on the upper (dorsal zone). Or will it be a completely disaster? What do you guys think? I am 5.9”-6” MEG but more in the depth than width (which gives the illusion of less thicker than a wider one), and I think a 0.3”-0.5” gains all over the sides of the shaft will make a substantial impact on how it looks. Of course skin has a lot to say here but just wondering…

I'm quite curious about that too, for all fillers, and in general how much freedom there is to shape it. I.e. is a baseball bat profile reasonable? What about a bloated shaoe to the underside?

Seems doable with some targeted injection and shaping.

The side that most surgeons don’t want to touch is the underside, cause of the proximity with the urethra .

Gg82 wrote: Seems doable with some targeted injection and shaping.

The side that most surgeons don’t want to touch is the underside, cause of the proximity with the urethra .

Yes, anything that can cause pressure on the urethra or can cause trouble with urination is completely off-label.

Should be totally possible imo, just putting stuff at the sides and not at the top

I agree that working on injection tecnique to widen the penis more on the sides would be aesthetically pleasant, and also would leave more visible your top veins.

My width is great after PMMA. Is it okay to use normal size condoms? It doesn t hurt me. I like it. its so nice tight with normal condom. Also when you re with escorts they often have their own condoms - you cannot choose haha

What's your width and Girth now Pmmafan?

I recall caincrosby on PhalloBoards v2.0 once mentioning that he uses both hands to pull a condom all the way down to his base, and then lets the ring at the base of dig into his softer PMMA. The post is somewhere near the end of his progress report on v2.0.

Cacx

"softer PMMA"? That doesn't make any sense.

I was mistaken -- it isn't in caincrosby's progress log.

Anyways, here's the post: phalloboards.websitetoolbox.com/post/ple...a-with-dr-m-10197134

Cacx

@Hyperbol
@softer Pmma
Everything correct. Pmma is described from many users as „as a thick skin“. (But some areas can also be rock hard.)
Use the Search-Function. You will see its often described as a thick skin which can be moved from the real shaft and that the real shaft under the Pmma can be identified.