TOPIC: Does A Bigger Dick Change Things?

Dr Casavantes told me he does not do length though. only width... He refered me to Dr Camacho for length. i thought u was interested in length too...

supa wrote: Finally, the joke about pedophilia is indeed very graceful. Won't comment further.

Shit my Texans lost!

Sorry dude that was no joke. Anyone who would make a statement like:

supa wrote: I mean young, attractive virgins

in 2013 (unless they are 14 years old) is at the very least so insecure that they cannot deal with real grown women or more likely have latent pedophile tendencies.

You are really, really creeping me out.

Sex is a seriously overrated pastime, in my opinion. Mass media are largely responsible for the worship of sex: in this time and age if you don't ejaculate onto a woman's face, you have not engaged in a threesome with Pamela Anderson looking girls that happily do ass-to-mouth, you are really missing something. They say.

As for women worrying about penis size, we let them! The balance of power tipped decades ago. It was not always like this.

It is my personal understanding (I might be wrong!) that ruthless bitches with a talent to make men miserable in the penis size compartment are particularly widespread in the US, relative to Europe say.Obviously, US culture propagates to Europe; on the plus side, Europeans can, say, enjoy reading the masterpieces written by Cormac McCarthy (please, consider reading "The Road", if you have not already). However, they also have to put with the underrated consequences of the popularity in Europe of "Sex and the City", for instance. How can the Sex&the City woman prototype coexist with the dominant conservative religious views in the US baffles me, but I digress.

What I am trying to say is that until you put "modern" women on the demand side and yourself on the supply, you will want lots of PMMA injected into your Cock. We let women believe they are sitting on a gold mine instead of a vagina. In the end, it is just pussy, not the holy grail. We should know better.

Heck, I have a large network of female friends, some of whom I've had intimacy/sex/size conversations with. I think it's healthy to engage the opposite sex in matters that essentially unite the sexes. What I think Supa is trying to get at are the segment of the female population who have used certain things (e.g. size) to suppress egos, manipulate, and even hurt men for whatever reason (presumably to achieve an upper hand in a relationship). Through PM's and IM's, I hear it all the time. And yes, I've read this stuff in message board threads, although more often at other PE Forums than here. It's just a reality. But these type of women should not be tolerated, just as women should not tolerate abusive men.

Hey DanceWithdrawing....Thanks for your posts. Yes we are men, and YES, we are supposed to talk about anything we need to discuss on this wonderful forum!
Thanks again....Keep us posted on your exciting adventure....Best to you.

supa wrote: That ship has sailed: You are a middle aged divorced man with a child. You are not good mating material for young virgins: you like research, so read it up.

Now that I know we are not joking get it all out dude. You will feel a lot better. Young virgins, is that desirable? Wow you are not a pedophile I hope. Get it all out.

At the end of all this, I will still be me and you will still be whatever you are.

Gotta run, my Texans are down by 10 with only 4 minutes to go.

hoddle10 wrote: For example, when Britney Spears first came to public attention, there was lots of speculation over her virginity. But no one ever talks child sex abuse victims as not being "virgins". I bet if you asked any healthy minded guy what they envision when they hear the term "young virgin" it would be a girl like say Britney Spears when she released "Hit Me Baby One More Time."

Thank you. You have made my case. Britney Spears was 16 years old when she released that hit. She was a minor. Where I come from that is illegal and borderline pedophile behavior. To suggest that anyone on this board would be "good mating material" for someone like that is very, very creepy.

In any case ban away. I have no wish to be associated with that line of reasoning!

Dear Hoddle, eqstudent can no longer reply.

To address your 3 points:

The notion of emasculation is as much theoretical as it is an opinion, and to find it condescending makes you far too sensitive to engage in these sort of conversations. I'm not entirely sure this "emasculation" is going on at all, but I have as much anecdotal evidence as you have to state its legitimacy one-way-or-the-other.Oh it's absolutely ironic. You were once a man with a thinner penis. Was your perspective different then? Now that you are bigger, has this changed your perception on things? I bet it has. Clearly size must have been of some importance. To seek out an experimental procedure for the purpose of augmenting one's size done purely for your own amusement? I doubt it.The point is that it makes you sound like a rude prick. I responded in kind in hopes that you'd see how it "sounded." I was hoping you would sense some disrespect, not because I meant to disrespect you, but so that you could see how it had an affect on others. It's easy to type away behind your screen, sometimes oblivious to your own arrogance.

At the end of all this, I will still be me and you will still be whatever you are

Now that you get responses for your arrogant tone, to your astonishment you find that the penny has dropped. Your late wording manoeuvre about not wanting to be disrespectful is not credible and comes too late.

Finally, the joke about pedophilia is indeed very graceful. Won't comment further.

I will still be a man of reason whereas you will continue to be a condescending soul: nothing, absolutely nothing which you have exhibited in this forum justifies your attitude: you have to completely recalibrate the concept of yourself: from the way you write it is totally thrown off balance; it would be funny if it were not tragic.

Quote: "What I am trying to say is that until you put "modern" women on the demand side and yourself on the supply, you will want lots of PMMA injected into your Cock"

Unfortunately that may never happen in the US. The men have lost there Balls and can't get them back. There are so many desperate men who will lower their standards to get "any" vagina, and this by itself will give the power to the woman. Add all the media that promotes women and demeans men, most men have no choice left but to add lots of PMMA to their penises and lots of Money to their wallets to be able to get a decent pussy!

Usual eqstudent's attitude, no problem, we are used to it. All is good guys.

When I talked about ruthless bitches I clearly emphasized that it was within my experience and personal understanding. I did not claim I was announcing a physical law of the universe. At any rate, I happily leave all the Sarah Jessica Parkers of the US to eqstudent and his dad; the kind of woman clearly all men want to see when they go back home after work.

It is all right to disagree and express different viewpoints (as eqstudent offered nothing more -how could he? This ain't algebraic topology!) but, of course when eqstudent does it, he feels compelled to act and write condescendingly. It is in his nature and there is nothing he can do about it, .

www.aesopfables.com/cgi/aesop1.cgi?4&TheScorpionandtheFrog