TOPIC: Circumcision choice- Pollock Method vs Conventional low and tights..have a decision to make..

I just found out about a Cosmetic Urologist in Toronto..who has a rather unique style of Circumcison.
The images on his site are interesting. The skin at the tip isnt touched. He takes away extra skin from the base of penis.

www.cosmeticurology.ca/services/adult-cosmetic-circumcision

Has anyone heard about this style of circumcision.

The best method is using a scalpel and glue instead of Sutures. The Pollock technique is just a quick and easy way of performing a Circumcision, most people who offer it in London aren't even trained surgeons, it's gimmick at best, you should avoid it.

Friends

I had first round of PMMA in 2016 and pretty happy with results.

Have been thinking of getting circumcised before getting round 2,3 and possibly 4 of PMMA and I will need a "low and tight" Circ.

Have consulted with two doctors in the city I live in Canada.
The first one has a clinic inside a pharmacy, willing to give me low and tight Circ(one needed for PMMA) and is priced bit low than the other. When I met him sometime ago he mentioned that I have a tight Frenulum..and recommended getting that cut along with Circ.He operates in his clinic and under local anesthesia.He uses stitches for closure.

The second doctor I met today is No2 ranked Urologist in big metropolitan city(as per rate MD). Operates out of a medical building and will perform adult Circ in a Hospital OR with IV sedation. His cost is comparatively higher(2K Canadian) for Circ and around 400 more for Frenulctomy. The only issue with him is he uses a special method developed by Dr. Pollock (he trained with him) .. www.pollockclinics.com/circumcision/adult-circumcision/ .
In this method..there is no way to "adjust" the high/low or loose/tight of the skin. He was upfront in telling me that.
He seemed to a more professional and he uses skin glue for closure and cut is done using a ring..so uniform and smooth edges.

I am confused on which will be better choice.