TOPIC: Dr. C

briceb wrote: I have to wonder how much of the information people are relying on is found here and how much did they receive directly from the doctor. If someone does not ask direct questions and get direct answers from their doctor, then they are relying on others, this board for example, for their answers. These people cannot then say "the doctor hid XYZ from me." If a potential patient only relies on this or any other board for their research, they are doing themselves a disservice. Although this is a great board full of very knowledgeable members, it is not a substitute for direct doctor/patient conversation.

slk20003 wrote: That's one of my points though, is that they keep changing their process and procedures.

brunoxxx wrote: I believe this forum has value because everyone is free to speak of their experience. That's all I was doing. I was not endorsing or promoting. I'll think twice before posting again.

needtogrow4 wrote: I see a lot of posts referencing Dr. C. Who are they referring to, is it Dr. Dr. Camacho or Dr. Casavantes?
I am at 4.25-4.5 Girth and it affecting every aspect of my life. I have extreme sexual anxiety and it's really been holding me back in pursuing relationships. I'm seriously considering surgery and have heard good anecdotes about a Dr. C. I sent Dr. Casavantes an email.

Another thing that concerns me, how do I know this website isn't just a marketing tool for these doctors? The results from Dr. C seem almost too good to be true. Sex within weeks, very natural looks, why does surgery have such a bad reputation if this doctor can perform miracles?

Thanks

slk20003 wrote:

needtogrow4 wrote: Another thing that concerns me, how do I know this website isn't just a marketing tool for these doctors? The results from Dr. C seem almost too good to be true. Sex within weeks, very natural looks, why does surgery have such a bad reputation if this doctor can perform miracles?

Thanks

You need to read more progress reports. I don't want to knock Dr. C, but the results are inconsistent at best. Even with the same person having multiple rounds. It's a crapshoot. Maybe you'll gain a half-Inch, maybe an Inch, or maybe you'll gain nothing. Maybe it will look normal, maybe it will look uneven, maybe you'll have a big circ ring, maybe you'll have nodules and lumps, or maybe you'll have several problems at once.

I can tell you this, there are very few people that have had this procedure, and it looks completely normal. I can also tell you that if you're gay, the chances are the men you're with will notice. If you're straight, some women might notice, and you'll have to think of an excuse to tell them, so they don't suspect it's a STD.

This is your Dick. This is the only Dick you have. Read all the negative reports, and then tell me that this is some miracle, or a marketing site for the Dr. C. Tell me if you'll be okay with the chance that your Dick will never again look and feel "normal", or at worst that you might have to have additional procedures (surgery) to remove hard lumps, nodules, or even deglove your Dick to remove all of it?

Maybe ask why this procedure isn't more common? I mean, if it's some "miracle" than why doesn't every plastic surgeon offer it? Why are you traveling to Tijuana Mexico to do it? Would you elect to go to Tijuana to have a "plastic surgeon" give you a nose job or a face lift, yet you don't even think twice about having them touch your Dick?

Also, why is it that in the past year it seems as if there's a definite trend of the results going down, and the number of problems going up? I'm not trying to tell you not to do it. It's up to you, but you should at least ask yourself these questions, and do some more research.

Restoration wrote: That was my initial approach, SpankAss - but so many reports of limited growth in R2 made me request 30% in R2 (10% in R1). I barely even got growth from R2. I don't even think there are many reports of people getting 10% in R2 and having noticeable growth.