TOPIC: 10% progress reports?

I'm not sure of the answer to your question but there was a post not long ago that had a listing of the 10% folks and each of their gains. Someone aggregated the data into one post. Anyone remember this one?

The gist of it was most people were getting pretty good results from just 10%.

Mudball wrote: Hoddle... Do you think there is any correlation with the Girth of the penis? Lets say the best gains were with smaller girths, then when they had larger girths after PMMA or just naturally, then 10% does not have enough concentration to stimulate the larger collagen growth? The larger Girth, requires the higher concentrations? Just a thought, your input is highly valued here! I am typing on my iPad mini so it is maddening to type long replies or questions so I hope you see what I am getting at?

I think surface area in general plays a big role. It makes sense to me that 20 cc of any concentration should be more effective on a smaller penis than bigger, as the beads will be closer together. If the proximity of the beads wasn't important then 2% or 6% would be fine.

But this is all just me thinking out loud based on what I've seen here. Ultimately the biggest thing I've noticed is that PMMA is damn unpredictable. Whilst correlations do appear based on amount, concentration and penis size, so often we see results that buck the trend. I think so much is down to individual anatomy and physiology.

It would be interesting to see how many of these guys maintained these results with one round of 10%. Depending on when these measurement were taken, size could fluctuate. I am just thinking of guys like M7 who had higher concentrations and decreased in size as time went on, until holding steady.

thanks carl. This is exactly what I was looking for. I'll look up hulk's thread as well.

Also, I should add, there does seem to be general trend of diminishing returns. It seems that quite often, in the end, guys go back for 3rd and 4th rounds, involving lots of PMMA being injected, but gaining not much. Whether this is the case with 30% I'm not sure. Fred and Olafspo seemed to get fairly consistent gains from 30%.

I think the key is to gain as much as possible, with as little PMMA as possible. If one insists on multiple rounds, I think it makes sense to start with 10% and then have each following round with 30%. Personally I'd not consider that, as I'd be scared to have so much injected. But if you want bigger gains, then that's what I'd do. The gains achieved by round 1 10%, seem to be no smaller than what Olafspo and Fred got from their first round with 30%. I guess this is because the initial immune reaction is the most dramatic, therefore the difference is seen more in density than volume.

Hoddle... Do you think there is any correlation with the Girth of the penis? Lets say the best gains were with smaller girths, then when they had larger girths after PMMA or just naturally, then 10% does not have enough concentration to stimulate the larger collagen growth? The larger Girth, requires the higher concentrations? Just a thought, your input is highly valued here! I am typing on my iPad mini so it is maddening to type long replies or questions so I hope you see what I am getting at?

I feel like 20cc's of 10% is a safe bet for a .5" increase in Girth and probably the best overall choice for aesthetics but just a newb so we'll see if my hypothesis is correct.

I may need 25ccs but that's still a great trade off in my eyes vs the other concentrations.

Who on the forum has had 10% rounds that has progress reports up? I've surfed through the forum and can only seem to find 20 and 30% sessions for the base and 10% for the upper shaft. I go in on Wednesday the 13th and I'm trying to get an idea of 10% vs. 30% PMMA at the base.