TOPIC: Lengthening surgery, twice?

Haha I highly highly doubt that this is true...
1) How could he gain so much with a simple lig cut?
2) How could he have enough skin to cover such a growth in such a short amount of time so quickly?
3) How could he even be functioning so soon after the surgery? (The article says only 1 month later he was begging for a reduction...)

All of this = NOT true.

What is the name of this doctor in Russia? I don't know if I would travel all the way to Russia for this type of surgery but have any members gone here? Is it normal to obtain these type of gains from lengthening surgery?

How long have you been stretching for so far soma?

hoddle10 wrote: The only reason for considering a second lengthening surgery, would be if the ligs reattached after the first surgery.

^ Agreed. There would be no need or a second lig cut unless this was the case.

Soma, do you have a report on your lig cut procedure anywhere? I'd love to know how it all went for you. By the way, did your surgeon use a spacer and are you still stretching?

I'll be away for seven days so I'm sorry if I don't reply 'til then bud!

They are talking purely about Girth. I've met Sava Perovic and Rados Djinovic.

This people claim that penis enlargement surgery may be performed up tp three times:

www.savaperovic.com/male-enhancement.html


But my guess is that they refer mostly to girth enhancement only.

Even when people are told they shouldnt expect more than half an Inch to maybe, 1.5 inches, they hope to be different and produce a two Inch gain or more in a matter of months. Of course they are nor pleased! lol

As I've stated in previous posts, before dying from cancer, I met with Professor Doctor Sava Perovic in Serbia. He was an excellent peyronie's surgeon and I would have chosen him over Egydio based on the graft material he uses (InteXen LP) as it is closer in physiology to a natural tunic. InteXen LP is still not approved for use in Brazil. Both Egydio and Perovic possess the experience and skill to carryout such a delicate procedure. He was a great man and he recommended against Ligamentolysis for Erect gains even when combined with postoperative traction. Severing of the suspensory and fundiform ligaments is a bad idea in my opinion. Of course, so is Jelqing, Hanging, Clamping, etc. When I queried Perovic, Egydio and Tom Lue concerning manual PE, they were unanimous on their viewpoint. "Don't do it" they stated emphatically. They are all masters of Urology and know more than anyone on Thunder's, Matters of Size, etc. While it may work for some, I prefer to listen to the experts. Do so at your own risk.

@ttar2380
The results from Ligamentolysis rarely satisfy most patients. While Flaccid length may be evident postoperative, an increase in Erect length requires diligent stretching of the penis over the course of many months. Many never gain anything even with consistent stretching. Soma, as I have mentioned before, is an ideal case scenario. He is young, determined and in fabulous physical condition. To my knowledge, he has gained slightly upwards of 3/4" in Erect length and is still gaining albeit more slowly.

KFH wrote:

hoddle10 wrote:

KFH wrote: So suspensory ligaments aren't really necessary compared to the fundiform ligaments hoddle?

Basically the ligs hold the penis in position. Without the support of ligaments the penis will just be loose and when erect will point downwards. The suspensory ligs are those at the front, so by releasing just them, the penis should still be pretty well supported. However this isn't always the case. I know of a couple of guys at Thundersplace who have had their suspensory ligaments cut, who now want them reattched as the penis feels loose at the base and makes penetration in certain positions difficult.

In this thread members of thunderplace discuss getting the ligs reattached:

www.thundersplace.org/forum/showthread.php?t=98113&page=1&pp=15

That's quite interesting. So for example, a patient has his suspensory ligaments cut and then stretches for 6-12 months and gains lets say, an inch in erect length.
If he has his suspensory ligaments reattached, could they attach the ligaments to a part of the penis that was further inside the body than before the lig cut?

Basically, do you think the patient would be able to keep his gains from stretching after the lig cut if he had his suspensory ligaments reattached?

According to Sava Perovic, the patient would lose his gains. Dr Perovic didn't claim patients would gain erect length though, so he was probably talking about losing flaccid gains. I don't think erect gains come from pulling the penis further out, so personally I don't think this would happen. Re-attaching the ligs is a tricky surgery and I don't think it has a high success rate.

I cannot speak for those doctors, but I think their intention was to make patients avoid anything that altered the penis too fast, since it is not something you can 'fix' quickly if damaged. If done correctly and over a longer time, there is not anything to be afraid of. Stretchers, for example, work very slowly, and gains are permanent.

Ignore it.