TOPIC: Looking for 20 Volunteers to participate in Filler Trial

So according to the reply I received I may be to large for the study at 6” bone pressed. Didn’t give my Girth size initially. Just a heads up to guys who’s interested in this.

New1inch wrote: So according to the reply I received I may be to large for the study at 6” bone pressed. Didn’t give my Girth size initially. Just a heads up to guys who’s interested in this.

Interesting. I suppose it makes sense that if it's a formal study, it probably has to have defined parameters and conditions. Curious to know their reasoning behind the length requirement.

Are you saying that they informed you that you weren't a qualified candidate, or you got the impression that you were too big for their study?

Skeptical_One wrote:

New1inch wrote: So according to the reply I received I may be to large for the study at 6” bone pressed. Didn’t give my Girth size initially. Just a heads up to guys who’s interested in this.

Interesting. I suppose it makes sense that if it's a formal study, it probably has to have defined parameters and conditions. Curious to know their reasoning behind the length requirement.

Are you saying that they informed you that you weren't a qualified candidate, or you got the impression that you were too big for their study?

The words were “you may be slightly bigger than the study inclusion criteria.” In reply I let him him that’s was BPEL and not Girth In the initial email in case their was confusion. So we’ll see.

Bumping.

Hate to see some guys who've been waiting months or years for an opportunity like this to slip pass their radar.

Ang updates on this I wish the requirements to be elligble were posted

They responded saying that there's injections into the shaft and head. I'm only interested in shaft injections. And now reading 6" BPEL is over criteria that seals the deal for me. I still may reach out to Schafer privately for HA.

So in order to quality you need to be under 6 inches in leghnt ?

When I sent a message i was not told you had to be under 6 inches in length.

Noxcuse wrote: When I sent a message i was not told you had to be under 6 inches in length.

Did you mention your length at all? I did. This was the response.

I did put my size in and there was no mention. I'm thinking that got a large influx of potential participants and just kept the emails short with minimal information.

Noxcuse wrote: I did put my size in and there was no mention. I'm thinking that got a large influx of potential participants and just kept the emails short with minimal information.

Idk bro.. the guy was a doc that responded. Guess we’ll see. Also require Multiple follow ups. So gotta be prepared for that as well if they want in person. I’m ok with that though as I fly for free.

Yeah, luckily I am local and just a train ride away.

According to New1Inch, the "6-Inch" thing may have been a confusion (BPEL vs Girth); that all said, it doesn't matter. Until they publicly post criteria for this study, I'd advise emailing them with interest and they'll let you know whether or not you're approved/qualified.

Besides, considering the fact that this study hasn't taken place, there is every possibility that qualifications and parameters can change to adapt to what's available. Until things are set in stone, just give the email a shot if you're truly interested.

I'm sure I'm just overthinking here, but does the email address seem odd to anyone else? I would just assume a doctors office conducting an in-house study would use a more official email, or linked email address. Obviously, I have trust issues. Lol

Captain wrote: I'm sure I'm just overthinking here, but does the email address seem odd to anyone else? I would just assume a doctors office conducting an in-house study would use a more official email, or linked email address. Obviously, I have trust issues. Lol

Or it could be the name of the person providing the screening/vetting for this procedure? I'm not sure I understand the insinuation or skepticism, are you suggesting this contact info is illegitimate or spam? I can assure you that this is a credible and legitimate trial opportunity.

I went ahead and asked if they could provide an alternative email to alleviate any one else's concerns, although I'm not sure where the skepticism is coming from. The new contact FOR THE STUDY is This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. and I've updated the original post. If you're looking for general inquiries, you can contact This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

This is for those seriously interested.