TOPIC: Sylvester

Finally reached my pe goals last year. I had the platinum microdroplet injections in Florida by dr Loria. I know he is not very popular here but a few forum members sent me PM's encouraging me to post about my experience. luckily I am happy with the results.
I do not read the board very often. thanks for the support and good luck with your goals.

Intial EG 4.2
NPEL 5.75

after the two rounds:
NPEL 5.75
EG base 6.25
EG midshaft 6.0

I assume these are the after pictures, it would be nice to see the before one's too (well, I did not have mine either). The aesthetics looks perfect.

Yea I'd like to see some before & after for perspective, otherwise these are just penis shots. And yes, Dr. Loria's popularity around here isn't so good, but that's all based on shilling efforts, lack of transparency, nasty PMs, behavior not fit for a medical professional, etc. That doesn't mean you can't share your experiences, as we all know Bluemale & Irishfan shared their stories in full.

And can you clarify "microdroplet" ?? Are you actually saying he uses the microdroplet technique recommended for products like Silikon 1000? Holy, how many injections and hours would that have taken to give you such a big result? Or is the doctor just using that term so that no one catches on to the fact that he's pumping high volume of silicone into your penis. Is he still hiding his "ingredients?" I mean I know members here are keen on seeing batch numbers and such, would Dr. Loria also offer the same service?

I asked for the ingredients but he could not give me the specifics. I should have asked beforehand but that's water under the bridge. One of the other patients told me he uses mostly PMMA mixed with a small amount of silicone to fill the gaps where the PMMA does not grow however he can not advertise it as such since the brand of PMMA he uses is not licensed for distribution in the US.

As far a microdroplet technique, I think it just means he injects it slowly from the syringe. Clearly I had a large amount of the mixture injected after each of my two procedures (they were 5 weeks apart and each session took roughly 90min). I don't know the number of CC's but it was definitely not a micro quantity.

I also think it is a good idea to be fully transparent about he ingredients and include the batch number ect. But Dr L does not provide this. For this reason I am hesitant to recommend him to others.

If there are any other Dr Loria patients reading this thread please feel free to add info about your experience.

Thanks for sharing Sylvester.

He not only refuses to share with you what he's actually injecting inside of you but he might be using non-licensed product in the U.S.? I doubt this altogether, but maybe an investigation should be underway? Is he aware of the ramifications?

So then it isn't "micro-droplet." He's just using it so that if you were to do your research, you'll think he's using silicone as instructed, which he's not.

And lastly, did you happen to have a before & after comparison? Just as a point of reference to see how much was augmented. Nearly two inches of Girth gain, yet so proportional with your glans, you must have had an unusually thin shaft before the procedure, no? And do you always have a curve, or it varies? One Erect shot seems very straight, the other one curves, almost like two different penises. I don't know, just observations, you'll have to pardon me, Dr. Loria has used shills & fake accounts in the past.

Is the first photo a before and the third an after?

Yeah I was gonna say...isn't that third pic a different penis? How very odd. Looks to have a larger circ area, a vein that runs through the circ area as opposed to underneath, and then of course the pronounced curve. Am I missing something haha

rdeal wrote: Yeah I was gonna say...isn't that third pic a different penis? How very odd. Looks to have a larger circ area, a vein that runs through the circ area as opposed to underneath, and then of course the pronounced curve. Am I missing something haha

On the first photo I can't see any filler. On the third I can see some areas that suggest some work has been done. But there is no way the 3rd photo is 2" bigger in Girth than the first, so it's confusing. The circ scar is puffy on the 3rd and you can see some undulations, which suggest a filler product. But the first photo is perfectly smooth and the skin complexion is different.

hoddle10 wrote:

rdeal wrote: Yeah I was gonna say...isn't that third pic a different penis? How very odd. Looks to have a larger circ area, a vein that runs through the circ area as opposed to underneath, and then of course the pronounced curve. Am I missing something haha

The circ scar is puffy on the 3rd and you can see some undulations, which suggest a filler product.

I've seen photos of shafts with undulations stemming from veins very much like the ones in this (3rd) photo... so while it could be suggestive of work, it could also very well be suggestive of an untouched penis. Hopefully Sylvester will clear it up.

Pic 1 and 4 are after round 1. Pic 2 and 3 were after the second round. I should have mentioned that. Also Pic 3 is not totally hard, I don't have a natural curve.

I did not take before pix regrettably.

Also having trouble uploading more pix at the moment. I will check back later.

ok got it to work here are a few recent ones with a full Erection

new pix

Thanks for the pictures, I just wish we had before shots. I mean... 4.2" is something I can relate to, I started even thinner...I just have trouble picturing this the end result of any procedure without some notable dwarfing of the glans. Like a 2" increase in Girth is huge, so much so that if you were to look at any procedure with gains north of 1.5"+, you can't help but detect proportional changes. Pardon my skepticism Sylvester, but I'm still not convinced.

Now we have shots of the underside of your penis, that doesn't give us much to compare to the original shots you provided us, minus the single undershot you gave us which has a submarine effect (a shape lacking in your current shots). Again, pardon me if I'm coming off as overly skeptical but if I had not read this thread and saw your penis photos, I would have never believed it was enhanced from an original 4.2" Girth. No amount of skill can offset a major change in proportion.

That said, maybe some more "over-top" pictures can help clear this up. Again, you are going to have to pardon the skepticism but we've dealt with this kind of thing in the past. I hope you have our understanding (I'm sure you've read previous Dr. L threads and know what's up).

Men are impressionable here, and a handful of doctors have tried to exploit that in the past, including Dr. L and his initial use of bogus photos (yup, that happened). So for current & new readers wondering why all the questioning, read up first.

The difference in veins and stuff could well be simply because the second round was recent and the first a few months before. I've read about veins in the skin coming back with time after other procedures, so if the second was done in the last couple of months it explains the difference.

How much did you gain each round?