TOPIC: Debating on waiting until the "low gains issue" is sorted out with different batches of PMMA
Re: Debating on waiting until the "low gains issue" is sorted out with different batches of PMMA
11 years 8 months ago #1285223759You'll be fine! I'm 9 days post op and I have a full Inch with no aesthetic issues so far. Your post op plan is key and it must be followed. All of the staff is amazing especially Wade, let him show you how to massage and care for your newly improved and larger member. Also, check out what I've done regarding post op maybe it will help you.
Best of luck
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Re: Debating on waiting until the "low gains issue" is sorted out with different batches of PMMA
11 years 8 months ago #1285227940- Restoration
-
- Offline
- General
-
- Posts: 1185
- Thanks: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Re: Debating on waiting until the "low gains issue" is sorted out with different batches of PMMA
11 years 8 months ago #1285233633Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Re: Debating on waiting until the "low gains issue" is sorted out with different batches of PMMA
11 years 8 months ago #1285235436'You'll be fine! I'm 9 days post op and I have a full Inch with no aesthetic issues so far.'
It was all grand even 4 weeks post op for me - solid gains and very uniform - perfect aesthetics results. Gain reductions and aesthetics issues only came after 5-6 weeks.
Another point - I saw a question (but no answer) I think in this thread on a PMMA price in quantities where it is injected under a skin in arms, bottoms, face etc. The assumption is that they would need much more of the stuff to fill these body parts. If it is the same stuff, is the price the same too? I just think if they should pump up a saggy bottom, they would need more than a few ml/cc's. Does anybody know?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Re: Debating on waiting until the "low gains issue" is sorted out with different batches of PMMA
11 years 8 months ago #1285236416- Restoration
-
- Offline
- General
-
- Posts: 1185
- Thanks: 0
yeah, 5-6 weeks is when I noticed a decline just starting as well.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Re: Debating on waiting until the "low gains issue" is sorted out with different batches of PMMA
11 years 8 months ago #1285237686Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Re: Debating on waiting until the "low gains issue" is sorted out with different batches of PMMA
11 years 8 months ago #1285239170Shergar wrote: I bet thee chicks aren't getting charged '95 per cc when they're stuffing 300cc's in.
I think they use 200-400 ccs in a butt. It depends how much you need, and it's just gonna be 30% for that . I talked to a girl in the waiting room who was getting her butt done, and I think she said 300 or something, and it was her 2nd trip.yeah, 5-6 weeks is when I noticed a decline just starting as well.
From metacrill website it is $400 for 10cc, so 300cc at cheapest would be $12 000 and that doesn't include hospital cost, profit. This is why I have warned countless girls who think they are having real PMMA injected in them,1000cc - 500cc for $2000 - $1000, the maths doesn't add up, it either sillicone doctors are using or cheap PMMA from china if they are lucky.
But Dr C is more trust worthy before people think it's a personal attack. Thought he charges around $65000 for I think 300cc, i don't know if that's per cheek
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Re: Debating on waiting until the "low gains issue" is sorted out with different batches of PMMA
11 years 8 months ago #1285239506michael wrote:Shergar wrote: I bet thee chicks aren't getting charged '95 per cc when they're stuffing 300cc's in.I think they use 200-400 ccs in a butt. It depends how much you need, and it's just gonna be 30% for that . I talked to a girl in the waiting room who was getting her butt done, and I think she said 300 or something, and it was her 2nd trip.yeah, 5-6 weeks is when I noticed a decline just starting as well.
From metacrill website it is $400 for 10cc, so 300cc at cheapest would be $12 000 and that doesn't include hospital cost, profit. This is why I have warned countless girls who think they are having real PMMA injected in them,1000cc - 500cc for $2000 - $1000, the maths doesn't add up, it either sillicone doctors are using or cheap PMMA from china if they are lucky.
But Dr C is more trust worthy before people think it's a personal attack. Thought he charges around $65000 for I think 300cc, i don't know if that's per cheek
All PMMA comes from China. The solution is produced in Brazilian, Dutch or American labs, but the PMMA itself comes from China.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Re: Debating on waiting until the "low gains issue" is sorted out with different batches of PMMA
11 years 8 months ago #1285240407Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Re: Debating on waiting until the "low gains issue" is sorted out with different batches of PMMA
11 years 8 months ago #1285240739- Mustang2020
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 1795
- Thanks: 18
hoddle10 wrote: All PMMA comes from China. The solution is produced in Brazilian, Dutch or American labs, but the PMMA itself comes from China.
Well, that may eplain the cost. The hardest thing is to make the PMMA beeds small, round and without many, if any sharp, edges and china can do that for a lot less than other counrtries. BUT, Quality control may be iffy at times. May be that explains the lack of gains lately? I do not know. The carrier may not be as expensive to manufacutre in other countries and hence we can have a session with Dr c for $2500 or so.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Re: Debating on waiting until the "low gains issue" is sorted out with different batches of PMMA
11 years 8 months ago #1285240833Mustang2020 wrote:hoddle10 wrote: All PMMA comes from China. The solution is produced in Brazilian, Dutch or American labs, but the PMMA itself comes from China.
Well, that may eplain the cost. The hardest thing is to make the PMMA beeds small, round and without many, if any sharp, edges and china can do that for a lot less than other counrtries. BUT, Quality control may be iffy at times. May be that explains the lack of gains lately? I do not know. The carrier may not be as expensive to manufacutre in other countries and hence we can have a session with Dr c for $2500 or so.
I think the quality control may happen in the labs that produce the final product. I could be wrong, but I think the buy the beads from China (I know that is true as I got it from Prof Lemperle) and then use some kind of filter in the labs to ensure they have the right size and shape beads to add the carrier.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Re: Debating on waiting until the "low gains issue" is sorted out with different batches of PMMA
11 years 8 months ago #1285241643- Restoration
-
- Offline
- General
-
- Posts: 1185
- Thanks: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Re: Debating on waiting until the "low gains issue" is sorted out with different batches of PMMA
11 years 8 months ago #1285258091Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Re: Debating on waiting until the "low gains issue" is sorted out with different batches of PMMA
11 years 8 months ago #1285258120ntuxpb wrote: I had R1 done in 2012 and debating to go for R2. How much have the prices inflated?
Can you update your progress report please?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Re: Debating on waiting until the "low gains issue" is sorted out with different batches of PMMA
11 years 3 months ago #1286855972- sizematters
-
- Offline
- General
-
- Posts: 12
- Thanks: 0
However, after reading this tread I am seriously thinking about cancelling my dream of having a larger one. I haven't deposited the $250 yet. I really do not want to inject foreign material into my penis for life with no long term studies done just for a .25 even .50 gain, plus the chances of deformity or forming granules..
So what's the news with this "low gains" issue? Can somebody update the tread with the latest developments/solutions made if any? Is Metacrill still a questionable option? ..or is it really the Clinic's greed or the patient's lack of aftercare?
Thanks!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.