TOPIC: Keep in mind ...

you'd feel different about # 5 if you had the lumps and nodules. Yes, there are naturally ugly dicks, but there are no natural dicks with 6-8 frozen peas inside of them. Women (and gay men) are going to be concerned about a partner who has a lumpy Dick unless they are so drunk and slutty that they don't even notice.

1) The realistic expected gain in invasive PE is proportional to the original penis size. If a 6" base increases to 7" then expected base for 4" is 7/6 X 4 = 4.7".

Invasive PE as in grafts or implants? Or were you referring to fillers? Not sure what you mean here.


2) Risk of complications is proportional to the ratio of injected volume to that of original penis volume.

I'm not sure if its's established as fact that such proportional relationship exists (although it seems plausible), but keep in mind you are at risk for complication the moment you get your first needle prick. Other factors that could be worth noting are number of visits, brands used, instrumentation, experience of physician, etc. Any number of factors can increase your chances for complications. This is true for virtually any PE method.


3) No practioner has yet mastered the art of PE procedures.

Well this is an opinion so not much to add here.


4) For as long as injectorate is in your body, there is the risk of reaction with ordinary medication.

Not sure about other fillers, but I don't believe there is any established risk of taking medication while having PMMA inside of you. I don't recall ever being told I couldn't take certain medications. Correct me if I'm mistaken.


5) There are many "naturally ugly" dicks. Post operatives need not bother about "lumps", "nodules" and "looks" of their little guys. Only EQ and size matter to women.

Ya...no. As others have chimed in, lumps and nodules, depending on size & location, can certainly be a problem. Imagine having it mistaken for an STD or deformity. That said, I do believe one could get away with very subtle aesthetic irregularities like unevenness or hard-to-see ridges. Depends really.

Also, I wouldn't say that EQ & size are the ONLY thing that matter to women. I'd imagine there are women out there who prefer an aesthetically "beautiful" unit, although it's probably not high on most of their penis-priority list lol. There is much debate in this, but I'd venture to say that EQ and stamina trump most all other penile attributes.


6) You are big only for the first one or two times. After this you are just as any other average guy to her.

I imagine this really depends on the woman. But I do imagine that if size wasn't a big priority for her, a big unit will lose its novelty sooner than later.


7) Whilst you stay the same, she can accomodate any size up to a baby's head. She needs only prepare herself for the initial pain - as she did when a virgin.

This is a bit misleading. Sure she can accommodate a baby's head, but this is an extreme scenario, and it wouldn't mean she's READILY accommodating circumferences that big. And there isn't just initial pain, there can be pain all throughout the sex. Women can and will adapt, but for the guys looking to upgrade in size, anticipate more lube & foreplay.


Women love pleasure mingled with pain.

As with #6, depends on the woman. Some don't like the pain, some like it mingled with pain, and others love be slapped and spit on lol. Just depends on who you're dealing with.


9) There are always those guys bigger than yourself. High probality she already met some before you ( unless you knew her as a virgin) and she will most likely never tell you. Where next??? ( I know I will still do PMMA!!!)

Right, and you could be her biggest and she will still tell you she's had bigger.

While you raise some interesting points, one theme I notice throughout your list is a lot of presumption with women and their tastes. Just like us guys have varying preferences, so too do women. Interestingly enough though, what women do share in common with penises is that a good majority may in fact be content with girths far below 6" in circumference (based largely on anecdotal evidence like sex toy purchases, forums, and surveys, but worth considering).

Good luck.

Thanks so much for correcting my English. I appreciate.

Two points of note:

1) Though notwhatiusetobe and honkydory are using terms to describe newcomers, be reminded that they come on research, at the end of which they have to make decisions. Research does not need conjecture, opinions and way out posts mingled with the "scientific" data. I have advocated "a little research" several times in the forums but contributors don't take the time to verify or analyse deeply. We will give more meaningful information when we make sure of what we post.

2) We are "empathetic" when we read those posts that tell a sad story. But in research we are looking for figures, statistics, actual reports etc. After reading these sad stories, guys still go for the procedures! This simply means that after the subtle and diplomatic "empathy" no one really gives a shit about the sad stories. There is gratitude for the openess, honesty and reaching out that the posts were in fact made and has an important effect on decision making, but the "empathetical" interlacing of the threads is making research somewhat difficult.

Sorry for hurting anyone guys, but some of us are just open,direct and sometimes hard ...

For starters on research ...

blogs.webmd.com/sexual-health-sex-matter...ecomes-pleasure.html

And Restoration, I try to be empathic but not for self-pity. A little research on how many women buy dildos with lumps and serrations?

Thanks a lot skeptical one and AstroD for wishing me luck.

I'll post when I'm ready and what happens afterwards. Right now I'm doing some lengthening exercises ...