TOPIC: Any updates from silicone microdroplet patients?

This is what I want to fix. Do you think silicone could do it? This is the side that was not cut into... on the other side, the same thing is going on but it's mostly visible from the top.

I am going to have scars forever, and I don't know how much skin I'll ever get back - so I guess I just want to fix what I can. There's even still a ball of PMMA under my shaft still - if you are wondering what that is...it's not my finger. My doctor didn't remove the whole thing.

I've spoken with Wade via email on the micro droplet technique. It sounds like they are getting great results and its part of their protocol for lumps, nodules, ridges etc

I'm uncut and it sounds ideal for behind glans and around Foreskin area. I think the fact it is softer allows you to add some volume and retain Foreskin, something that is not guaranteed with PMMA.

@Restoration - I was always surprised that you chose surgical Removal of the lumps, rather than camouflage using the micro droplets. If you're really considering more surgical Removal, I'd have thought that the micro droplet technique would hide your lumps and imperfections while adding a small amount of Girth at the same time, all with low risk and limited downtime. I'm no expert but I've had to consider options as I had similar lumps to you. This is just my thought based on reading progress reports and talking with Wade and Dr. C.

How are you all doing? My understanding is that this is a nearly risk free (in terms of nodules), but you wouldn't get much Girth.

For those who got it - how much size did it provide?

I have an abrupt divot where some PMMA and skin was cut out (due to the Dermatologist in the USA screwing up the minor Nodule excision - which I linked in my signature line)...it looks weird...feels weird... but Dr. C and I don't think PMMA is a great idea for me.

Even a 1/4" gain at the circ area would be great so there wasn't such an abrupt drop (depending on the day - I measured the circ at 4.25-4.5 since so much was removed). It might soften the ridges too - which would be nice. I'm just thinking about it - I know I said I'm done w/ all this - but who knows. As time goes on & the skin doesn't seem to stretch & I literally got rug burn from ordinary sex...I'm thinking of options.

I'm sure a lot of people are curious how the silicone recipients are anyway, aside from me. Thanks!

It is injected in very small drops in the same plane.

With the few silicone PR's floating around, I've been pretty impressed with the short-term results. So much so that I've contemplated a (hopefully) final Revision in my only problem area: tight skin behind glans, north of circum line, marred minimally by small nodules & ridges. If I get said-procedure done, I'll update the forum, but this probably wont happen (if at all) until Summer.

I have had micro droplets twice. Had 2ccs done on my 2nd round to ease with the transition from PPMA to gland. And 2ccs done on my 3rd round to smooth out some places that Wade missed when he did it the previous time. I probably gained maybe a quarter Inch in the area from it. Well, I say that, but they also did some 10% in the area on my last round to smooth everything out as well. So it might not have all been from the micro droplets. But there was a definite gain and visual appearance improvement from it

I obtained a sizable increase in Girth from micro drops. It also seems to feel more natural and it stays where it is injected.

I got a few cc's with my last round. They we're done at the end. Probably about 30-40 sticks. I think it gave a little finished look to the PMMA. Everything looked a little smoother than previous rounds.
I believe wade said they've done entire penis's this way with multiple, multiple rounds.
I was happy with a 10%-30% mix and top it off with micro drops. Think I'm doing them with my last round in March.

majk1 wrote: I got a few cc's with my last round. They we're done at the end. Probably about 30-40 sticks. I think it gave a little finished look to the PMMA. Everything looked a little smoother than previous rounds.
I believe wade said they've done entire penis's this way with multiple, multiple rounds.
I was happy with a 10%-30% mix and top it off with micro drops. Think I'm doing them with my last round in March.

Basically describes exactly my last round.

On top of the PMMA I got, I only had 4.5ccs of the micro-drops (the circ region, a bit top center about 1" down from circ area (a stubborn area that just wouldn't go up with PMMA) and the top of the base near where it meets my fat pad).

To be honest I can't really tell a huge difference... I mean likely it did something but there's no way for me to tell what's the result of the PMMA and what's the result of the silicone micro-droplets... then again maybe that's a good thing.

Sizemic wrote:

majk1 wrote: To be honest I can't really tell a huge difference... I mean likely it did something but there's no way for me to tell what's the result of the PMMA and what's the result of the silicone micro-droplets... then again maybe that's a good thing.

Yeah I think that's why he's been using it and pushing it. To me it looked I guess a little more refined is the best way to put it.

I was under the impression it was more superficial (as in higher up) than where the PMMA was injected, but I could be wrong.

Yeah great question, I was thinking about making a post just like this.

Another question: does it stay in place better than PMMA? I remember hearing that it might be better at staying in the circ area, where PMMA sometimes has difficulty staying put.

I just read this on real self... I was surprised.

Silikon 1000 is a product that can be used for lip augmentation. I have many patients who have undergone lip augmentation with silicone by other physicians, but I choose to avoid silicone or silikon 1000 injections altogether. Rather, on a weekly basis, I correct silicone lip complications resulting from migration, inflammation, nodule formation, and generalized infection.

Then, another surgeon followed up and said:

The potential for Silikon 1000 to migrate is likely related to the method of injection with a depot technique more likely to be associated with this. The use of the microdroplet technique with conservative lip augmetnation is puported to lower the risk of this complication. It is an off-label indication.

So, obviously Avanti uses the microdroplet technique, which sounds a lot safer then - without the risks that people think of when they hear silicone.

www.realself.com/question/silikon-1000-migration-risks

Is it injected on the same plane as the Metacrill (between bucks and dartos) - or do they put it up higher? I wonder how it manages not to slip around. PMMA seems to follow the path of least resistance in some cases.

Yeah, I thought that too - S.O. I asked because of any risk there would be little skin bumps. Doesn't sound like it if it's deep though.