PhalloBoards - An Online Community to Discuss Penile Girth Enhancement
TOPIC: the switch to 10% pmma
Re: the switch to 10% pmma
15 years 2 days ago #1269655524
It's true, what I know that for more dense implant ( skull bone defect) you will need higher concentration of PMMA e.g. 40-45% , that's why Dr. Nacule is developing this high concentration for skull bone defect reconstruction.
Check in this site the topic about Newplastic:-
www.facialwasting.org/buttock_wasting.htm
So if the 10% will give the same gains as 20% ---> it must mean that the end result of the 10% has to be softer (in texture) than the more denser collagen after the injection of the 20% , and of course as we know the 10% has an advantage of less chance of developing lumps.
So the gain in girth will depend mostly on the distance between the beads and how many layers (or sheets) of the beads on top of each other (in cross section of the penis) and rarely on the number of beads (of course it has some effect on the gain but less).
So if we have beads very close to each other (e.g. 30%) you will have much firmer collagen in the end result and also the chance of more lumps, ( also not to forget in 40-45% or more it will feel almost like bone), but the gain in girth in the end result of different concentration with the same volumes will be either little or no difference.
So if we have e.g. two identical penises who had been injected with same number of beads but :-
One had two sessions of 10% Newplastic 10 cc in each session = 20 cc in total ( as we know that 10% conc. i.e. 3 millions beads in 1 cc ---> 3x20 = 60 millions beads.
The other penis had only one session he was injected with 20% conc. and only 10 cc (---> 6 millions beads x 10 = 60 millions beads ).
So both had 60 millions beads but I am sure the 1st one will have more gain than the 2nd one because in the 1st one you have more layers of beads on top of each other ---> more gain in girth , so the gain in girth will depend on the distance between the 60 millions beads from each other in a giving area (so more distance more gain in girth)
Even if you inject the 1st one with 20 cc of 10% in one session instead of two sessions will also gain more than the 10 cc of 20% injected in the other penis (at the end both patients will have the same number of beads but the distances between these beads are different).
In the other hand if we inject the same volumes in the above examples with different concentrations (e.g. 10% + 20%) --> in the higher conc. sure you will have a more denser and firmer collagen but also IMO you will have some more gain (may be a little) than the lower conc.
In conclusion :- The gain will depend more on the volume and the number of the sessions (i.e. the distance between the beads) more than the concentration of the beads.
This is a Q. for the guys who had I think in the 1st session different concentration ( 10% near to the Glans, 20% in the shaft and 30% near to the base ) Was the collagen firmer or more denser near to the base than near to the Glans ??
Check in this site the topic about Newplastic:-
www.facialwasting.org/buttock_wasting.htm
So if the 10% will give the same gains as 20% ---> it must mean that the end result of the 10% has to be softer (in texture) than the more denser collagen after the injection of the 20% , and of course as we know the 10% has an advantage of less chance of developing lumps.
So the gain in girth will depend mostly on the distance between the beads and how many layers (or sheets) of the beads on top of each other (in cross section of the penis) and rarely on the number of beads (of course it has some effect on the gain but less).
So if we have beads very close to each other (e.g. 30%) you will have much firmer collagen in the end result and also the chance of more lumps, ( also not to forget in 40-45% or more it will feel almost like bone), but the gain in girth in the end result of different concentration with the same volumes will be either little or no difference.
So if we have e.g. two identical penises who had been injected with same number of beads but :-
One had two sessions of 10% Newplastic 10 cc in each session = 20 cc in total ( as we know that 10% conc. i.e. 3 millions beads in 1 cc ---> 3x20 = 60 millions beads.
The other penis had only one session he was injected with 20% conc. and only 10 cc (---> 6 millions beads x 10 = 60 millions beads ).
So both had 60 millions beads but I am sure the 1st one will have more gain than the 2nd one because in the 1st one you have more layers of beads on top of each other ---> more gain in girth , so the gain in girth will depend on the distance between the 60 millions beads from each other in a giving area (so more distance more gain in girth)
Even if you inject the 1st one with 20 cc of 10% in one session instead of two sessions will also gain more than the 10 cc of 20% injected in the other penis (at the end both patients will have the same number of beads but the distances between these beads are different).
In the other hand if we inject the same volumes in the above examples with different concentrations (e.g. 10% + 20%) --> in the higher conc. sure you will have a more denser and firmer collagen but also IMO you will have some more gain (may be a little) than the lower conc.
In conclusion :- The gain will depend more on the volume and the number of the sessions (i.e. the distance between the beads) more than the concentration of the beads.
This is a Q. for the guys who had I think in the 1st session different concentration ( 10% near to the Glans, 20% in the shaft and 30% near to the base ) Was the collagen firmer or more denser near to the base than near to the Glans ??
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Re: the switch to 10% pmma
15 years 2 days ago #1269685482- Mustang2020
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 1795
- Thanks: 18
May be, but many times it is more to do with marketing cost strategy than the cost to manufacture a product....I can see the cost being 40% less or more for different percentages....not sure, just guessing. It would be nice to know.
So far, my 10% 1st session has no to minimum irregularities...We will have to wait and compare notes in the next few weeks.
So far, my 10% 1st session has no to minimum irregularities...We will have to wait and compare notes in the next few weeks.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Re: the switch to 10% pmma
15 years 2 days ago #1269843437
@Coolhandluke
So if I understand you right you're worried I'll start a 10% PMMA Bonanza? lol
HC
So if I understand you right you're worried I'll start a 10% PMMA Bonanza? lol
HC
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Re: the switch to 10% pmma
15 years 2 days ago #1269819635- Miracle8x7
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 1328
- Thanks: 1
Re: the switch to 10% pmma
15 years 2 days ago #1269816309- Justabitmore
-
- Offline
- General
-
- Posts: 377
- Thanks: 0
10% update
It works! (For me)
I gained 0.4 inches in second round and went from 6.15 to 6.55 average. First round they used 20cc 2nd round they used 16 so 20% less and actually in volume terms my second round (relative to cc used) is exactly like round one!
I had a 6.15 starting point for round two if you have a 5 Inch starting point and you get 20 cc (instead of 16cc) you will easily get 0.75
I started at 5.55 with newly injected FFT which by now would have dropped a bit. and now I have a 6.55 average Cock after two rounds of sensible amounts (doctors choice no pressure from me) 10% solution. that's a one Inch gain on an already large penis and with maybe 0.15 (guess ) shrinkage from FFT IE 1.15 gain. on a 5 Inch Cock that would be 1.25 on a 4.5 Inch Cock that would be 1.4 (roughly) all done with 10% solution!
It works! (For me)
I gained 0.4 inches in second round and went from 6.15 to 6.55 average. First round they used 20cc 2nd round they used 16 so 20% less and actually in volume terms my second round (relative to cc used) is exactly like round one!
I had a 6.15 starting point for round two if you have a 5 Inch starting point and you get 20 cc (instead of 16cc) you will easily get 0.75
I started at 5.55 with newly injected FFT which by now would have dropped a bit. and now I have a 6.55 average Cock after two rounds of sensible amounts (doctors choice no pressure from me) 10% solution. that's a one Inch gain on an already large penis and with maybe 0.15 (guess ) shrinkage from FFT IE 1.15 gain. on a 5 Inch Cock that would be 1.25 on a 4.5 Inch Cock that would be 1.4 (roughly) all done with 10% solution!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Re: the switch to 10% pmma
15 years 2 days ago #1269816318- coolhandluke
-
- Offline
- General
-
- Posts: 225
- Thanks: 0
Greetings A-team!
As supa recommeded, On sunday i finally sent my inquiry to Dr.Casavantes' 3 known business related email addresses and nurse wade's e-mail address. I have not received a reply back. I will wait till thursday before i give them a call.
Cheers gents
~Coolhandluke
As supa recommeded, On sunday i finally sent my inquiry to Dr.Casavantes' 3 known business related email addresses and nurse wade's e-mail address. I have not received a reply back. I will wait till thursday before i give them a call.
Cheers gents
~Coolhandluke
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.